andrej pejic models chris benz SS12 via sight management studio |
IMG models via models.com |
Pending your online shoe shopping experiences and to whichever international shoe size conversion theory you subscribe,
women’s US shoe sizes are either identical to or a half size larger than
Australian sizes.
But it does beg the question, are there tall women
with small feet?
It seems so. Dutch supermodel Lara Stone, who
recently moved from the world number one spot on models.com’s Top 50 Women
list to the site’s “Industry Icons” section, is 5’10” and takes a US size 7
and reports that she has frequently been obliged to wear one size bigger on the
runway. But some brands are happy to custom-fit shoes. Case in point Givenchy.
“They made me my own special shoes” Stone told The New York Times in March 2007. “I’m so happy”.
Miranda Kerr, at 5’9”, also takes a size 7 US according to IMG Models.
Monika ‘Jac’ Jagaciak – who many may recall was dis-invited from appearing as the face of Australian Fashion Week in 2008 because of her age at the time (14) - is 5’10” and takes a 7.5 US shoe size.
A quick check on various agency websites suggests that the
most common published shoe size for 5’10”-5’11” tall models is US 8 or 9.
But there is
some anecdotal evidence that model shoe sizes are increasing – just as the shoe size in the general population is said to be increasing. And it’s not something that women in particular tend to like to advertise, according to a 2011 survey by UK department store Debenhams, which reported 82percent of respondents who take
a UK 8/9 (US 10.5-11.5) saying they are “ashamed” of the size of their feet; with 47% admitting to lying to friends and partners about their shoe size.
In a 2002 interview with Slate.com, Elite Model
Management agent Roman Young reported that the average US shoe size for models
had “climbed” to 9 or 10. Young added that models who take a size 11 or 12 may
find themselves the targets of size discrimination when it comes to runway shows,
recalling a recent Gucci show for which he claimed models had been cast, Cinderella-like,
based on whether or not they could fit into a certain shoe.
Noted Young, “You had the most beautiful girls in
the world trying to cram their feet into this handmade boot that was like a
size 8”.
Has much changed in a decade?
When Calvin Klein Collection Womenswear creative
director Francisco Costa was in Australia in March 2010, we learned that
special shoes had to be made to fit new Australian face Julia Nobis for her Calvin Klein exclusive New York Fashion Week in February
that year, her international runway debut.
How big? US size 11 according to Nobis’ Australian
mother agency, Priscillas Management (and Ford Models now) – with other sources at the
time suggesting her real size may be in fact a US 12 and speculating that this may have proved problematic for Nobis for other show castings that season.
julia nobis at calvin klein FW1011/getty via daylife; (bottom) the two pairs of shoes customised for nobis by calvin klein for the show (screen grab frockwriter at today tonight) |
Modelling womenswear has been a major talking point
in the career of Andrej Pejic but as a man, it also has its disadvantages. Pejic takes a women’s US size 11 shoe but frequently finds himself having to squeeze
into a size 10 for runway work according to The Washington Post.
But as it emerges, there are larger shoe sizes than Pejic's up on the womenswear runway. Coincidentally, they belong to other Australians. Not that anyone is talking about it.
Reportedly, six foot tall Elle Macpherson takes a US size 12 - and is "self-conscious" about the fact.
Reportedly, six foot tall Elle Macpherson takes a US size 12 - and is "self-conscious" about the fact.
Then there is 5’11” Abbey Lee Kershaw, who is
officially listed on the websites of both her Australian mother agency Chic Management and US agency Next Models as a US size 10.
We now know for sure that that size is incorrect. According to sources close to Kershaw, she takes an
Australian size 13.
We also hear that Kershaw's family initially feared her extra-large feet would prove problematic for her modelling career. Ranked today as the world number #4, evidently they had nothing to worry about.
Although we now wonder what, if any, role ill-fitting
shoes may have played in Kershaw’s stumble on Rodarte's runway at New York Fashion Week in September 2008 – a fall that undoubtedly would not have helped what her agency has repeatedly described as a "long-standing" knee
problem (which recently required surgery in New York).
shoe detail from rodarte's SS09 show/style.com (not kershaw's foot) |
Or indeed, what role ill-fitting shoes may have
played in Jagaciak’s spectacular fall on Hervé Leger’s runway in February 2009:
monika jagaciak at hervé léger FW0910 via fashionising.com |
To be sure, many models have come a cropper in high heels on
fashion runways, with most simply assuming that it’s the height of the shoes
that’s the problem. But what role might ill-fitting high-heeled shoes play in
runway slip-ups? And in the interests of the occupational
health and safety of their models, should designers perhaps take greater care to ensure that the shoes fit the models cast in their shows? Or with the shoes often organised well in advance of the castings, is that just hugely impractical?
Six months after that fall at Rodarte, Kershaw in fact pulled out of the Fall/Winter 2009/2010 season altogether, with her agent citing the knee problem and
an inability to negotiate “walking in high-heeled shoes”.
Little wonder she refused to walk in Alexander McQueen’s "Armadillo" monstrosities the following season.
Little wonder she refused to walk in Alexander McQueen’s "Armadillo" monstrosities the following season.
0 comments:
Post a Comment