Saturday, May 2, 2009
Fernando Frisoni closes RAFW
Labels:
australian fashion week,
fernando frisoni,
SS0910,
videos
Blog Archive
-
►
2013
(66)
- ► April 2013 (7)
- ► March 2013 (25)
- ► February 2013 (14)
- ► January 2013 (13)
-
►
2012
(115)
- ► December 2012 (6)
- ► November 2012 (10)
- ► October 2012 (10)
- ► September 2012 (4)
- ► August 2012 (15)
- ► April 2012 (17)
- ► March 2012 (12)
- ► February 2012 (7)
- ► January 2012 (7)
-
►
2011
(153)
- ► December 2011 (4)
- ► November 2011 (8)
- ► October 2011 (11)
- ► September 2011 (14)
- ► August 2011 (5)
- ► April 2011 (10)
- ► March 2011 (22)
- ► February 2011 (20)
- ► January 2011 (21)
-
►
2010
(330)
- ► December 2010 (32)
- ► November 2010 (30)
- ► October 2010 (28)
- ► September 2010 (43)
- ► August 2010 (16)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (17)
- ► February 2010 (29)
- ► January 2010 (16)
-
▼
2009
(415)
- ► December 2009 (10)
- ► November 2009 (7)
- ► October 2009 (7)
- ► September 2009 (18)
- ► August 2009 (32)
-
▼
May 2009
(31)
- Rose is a rose is a rose
- In Vogue: Myf Shepherd
- Size matters
- Femmes fatales
- Glamour Kills pwns Twitter
- Blond ambition
- Lights, camera, Twitter
- The year of the Rutt
- Betty Blue
- New York Times chairman makes a WISH
- RAFW in The New York Times
- Blurring the lines: Twitter and the RAFW social me...
- Fernando Frisoni closes RAFW
- Fernando Frisoni SS0910 - opened by a child #RAFW
- On the record: Fashion Wire Daily's Godfrey Deeny
- New Gen - Zaicek #RAFW
- New Gen - By Weave #RAFW
- New Gen - Stand #RAFW
- New Gen - Emma Milikins #RAFW
- New Gen - Nana Judy #RAFW
- New Generation (group show) Miss Unkon #RAFW
- On the record: online buyer Sarah Pavillard
- Michael Lo Sordo finale
- Backstage with Magdalena Velevska
- Magdalena Velevska finale
- Karla Spetic finale
- Julie Grbac finale
- Gary Bigeni finale
- Sara Phillips finale
- Michael Lo Sordo SS0910 #RAFW
- Backstage B4 Michael Lo Sordo #RAFW
- ► April 2009 (131)
- ► March 2009 (26)
- ► February 2009 (50)
- ► January 2009 (31)
-
►
2008
(229)
- ► December 2008 (23)
- ► November 2008 (31)
- ► October 2008 (34)
- ► September 2008 (63)
- ► August 2008 (26)
- ► April 2008 (1)
-
►
2007
(56)
- ► August 2007 (7)
- ► April 2007 (8)
- ► March 2007 (7)
- ► February 2007 (25)
-
►
2006
(42)
- ► November 2006 (2)
- ► October 2006 (5)
- ► September 2006 (17)
- ► April 2006 (16)
7 comments:
hi, i know this is completely off topic but I am doing some research and wanted to know what happened with the morrissey edmiston split in 1997. All I can seem to find is that it was a 'famous nasty split' but no other details surrounding it.
Thanks,
Kate
Really dissapointed with your coverage of fashion week , Twitter is crap , not needed and a waste of blogspace , where is the writing ? am i missing something ? no comments to read ? what a shame ! do yourself a favor and stick with your old format
last week was a bit of an experiment for me. i'm sorry you were disappointed. but all i can tell you is that while you hated it, others say that they loved it. last week this blog's traffic doubled - on one day nearly tripled - and i have hundreds of new twitter followers.
this subject merits greater discussion which i will get to asap. just attending to some paid work. writing is in fact how i earn a living - something i don't manage to do from this blog, in spite of the considerable time that i devote to it. last week this included 30+ posts each day, including 37 live streaming videos - 20 of them designer/industry player interviews, with some of the videos being being picked up by other blogs.
I have to agree with Anon.
I can understand and appreciate the value of small news bites but in terms of covering entire collections through tweets - Where's the context? Is there real value in blurry images accompanied by musings of 150 characters or less?
I agree with the previous Anons. I feel this initial, almost instantaneous documention devalues other forms of coverage. I'd liken it to watching a feature film on YouTube before it's released in cinemas. Perhaps you need to address the quality of both the image and sound you provide via Twitter as it was apparent that something was amiss from your first blog of the shows.
"I'd liken it to watching a feature film on YouTube before it's released in cinemas."
Spot on Anon #3.
I'm sorry Patty. I have to laugh. But, I must say, under no circumstances am I anonymuous, anonymous, or anonymous. Why are these people so scared of their opinion that they don't want to leave their name?
You know how I feel about Twitter. I think it's lowering the standards of media and information, not only on the level of it's delivery - substandard pictures and poorly-punctuated, abbreviated writing - but also the fact that my 9 yr old son could easily pick up as many followers as you. By this I mean, the punters will accept any crap that's being put out there.
I have moral objections on other levels too, regarding the path that society is taking re the acceptance of this type of 'networking' as a media outlet,and what that will be doing to the next generation as far as social/relationship abilities, and the whole learning to grow and function using all those necessary components such as patience, imagination, creation, contemplation and so on that is becoming increasingly less in this world of instant gratification and useless commentary, but that's another rant entirely.
What it really comes down to is, the instant images (if they were good quality), are great, if accompanied by a decent commentary. Your blog is very enjoyable like that. But, otherwise, I think you're really selling yourself short. And are you sure you can attribute your jump in blog traffic to Twitter, or is it just people seeking current info about the shows?
For the twits who rely on the poor, yet speedy 'information' that the medium delivers, you can twit, but you shouldn't do it at the expense of any quality on your blog. And don't get me started if you're a actually a photographer who happens to blog as well!
But that's just my opinion :)
Signed, Undiesontheoutside
Post a Comment